* Freehand (slavish and free);
* with the help of media (glossy, transparent screen or by using digital techniques).
If imitation is faced with writing a character far from home, or at least more fluid, making a kind of falsification that slavish, in which case the script has tremors and uncertainties, as the hand stops often better reproduce the chart formations. In the case of false freedom, imitation is drilled previously to reproduce the signature in order to gain speed and a certain spontaneity. However a document can be forged according to other aspects, for example: *
affixing a date later than that of manufacture of a particular media type (according to research by type, stamp cards are never more than a stock of three years);
* The writer does not use half the market in relation to dating;
The date can be handwritten with the text, or content about the signature, then there may be a different hand to tweens' interior of an autograph.
In the case of photocopying, please note that even when you are faced with an autograph, this may have been reported from an original on a second copy using glossy or clipping.
Besides the fact that a photocopy can be easily manipulated, it is good to keep in mind that the process of copying not only alters the support (sometimes reporting the presence of grains of toner), but also the structure of the letters in case of poor inking not allow them to see the trend and interletterale intergrammico and the degree of pressure, especially if the script was penned in blue ink: an enlargement does not solve the problem.
The inability to examine these graphics is to take this in the Conclusions, which are still relevant: we can say is, that the writing belongs or not the hand of a subject, but not if this has been affixed by him on that particular document, given the absence of the original.
In the case of photocopying it is not possible to give a technical opinion itself, as it must always bear in mind the possibility of manipulation.
In the case of photocopying it is not possible to give a technical opinion itself, as it must always bear in mind the possibility of manipulation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment